Ad Placement Heatmap Simulator

Preview common ad sizes placed on your page layout.

Shading shows typical relative attention based on general eye-tracking and scroll-depth research - not measured data from your specific page.

What this is (and isn't)

This overlays standard ad sizes onto common page layouts, shaded by the general attention pattern most eye-tracking research finds for that layout type - readers concentrate attention on the headline and opening content, give secondary attention to sidebars and feature sections, and rarely scroll-engage with footers. It is meant to help you sanity-check ad placement against where attention typically concentrates before you build the actual page.

This is illustrative general guidance, not eye-tracking data from your specific page or audience. Your actual users' behavior can differ meaningfully based on content, design, and intent.

Why this uses general research patterns rather than claiming to predict your specific results

Real eye-tracking and scroll-depth studies consistently find the same broad pattern across many different sites with similar layouts - strong attention near the top and in main content, weaker attention toward footers - but the exact numbers for any one specific site depend on its content, design, and audience intent in ways a generic simulator simply can't capture. Being upfront about that distinction is what keeps this tool useful as a planning aid rather than misleadingly precise.

Why checking ad placement before building the actual page saves real rework

Seeing roughly where attention concentrates on a layout before any content exists lets you sanity-check ad placement decisions early, when moving an ad slot is just editing a mockup - catching an ad placed directly in your highest-value content real estate at this planning stage is far cheaper than discovering a poor placement after the page is built and traffic is already flowing through it.

Why high-attention zones aren't automatically the right place for every ad

An ad placed directly in your most-read content can generate more views, but it can also measurably hurt reading experience and engagement - which is exactly why many publishers deliberately spread some ad placements into secondary zones, trading some potential ad views for a page that readers are more willing to stay on and return to.

Frequently asked questions

Is this based on real data from my site?

No - it illustrates general attention patterns common across many sites with similar layouts, not measurements from your specific page or visitors. For real data, use heatmap tools like Hotjar or Microsoft Clarity on your live site.

Should I always put ads in the "high attention" zones?

Not necessarily - placing ads directly in your most valuable content real estate can hurt user experience and engagement even if it gets more ad views. Many publishers deliberately place some ads in secondary zones to balance revenue with readability.

Why doesn't this tool just show exact numbers instead of general shading?

Real attention patterns vary by a site's specific content, design, and audience intent in ways a generic simulator can't capture - showing general research-backed patterns rather than invented precise numbers keeps the tool honest about what it actually knows.

What's the benefit of checking this before the page is even built?

Moving an ad placement on a mockup costs nothing, while discovering a poor placement after a page is live and already getting traffic means reworking something real - checking early avoids that costlier rework.

Should I trust this over an actual heatmap tool on my live site?

No - treat this as early-stage planning guidance only. A real heatmap tool measuring actual visitor behavior on your live page is always more reliable once that page exists and has traffic.

More in Technical SEO & Site Management