Why this never writes dosing instructions
This tool deliberately has no field for medication doses, frequencies, or administration instructions - that category of content carries too much risk of real patient harm from a formatting mistake to belong in a general-purpose web tool with no clinical review step. It only reorganizes the plain-language explanation, rationale, and general guidance you already wrote into a clear, consistent layout for patients.
Always review the formatted output yourself before sharing it with a patient - this tool checks nothing for medical accuracy, only structure.
Why this is strictly a formatting tool, never a content source
Every word of clinical substance in the output - what the condition is, why it matters, what to do, when to seek help - comes from what you, the clinician or educator, typed into the four fields. The tool's only job is arranging that content into a consistent, patient-friendly layout; it never looks anything up and never adds a fact, rationale, or instruction you didn't write yourself.
Why the four-section structure matters for patient understanding
Splitting information into what it is, why it matters, what to do, and when to seek help mirrors how patient education materials are conventionally organized - that structure helps a patient quickly find the specific piece of information they need later (especially "when to seek help") rather than having to re-read a single undifferentiated block of text.
Why dosing is handled by refusing to offer the feature at all, rather than by a warning
A warning label on a dosing field can still be skipped past under time pressure, but a field that simply doesn't exist can't be misused by accident - this tool's design choice to omit dosing and administration fields entirely, rather than include them with a caution, is a deliberately stronger safeguard against that specific category of patient-harm risk.