How this differs from a summarizer
A summarizer pulls highlight bullets out of a long article someone else wrote. This tool does the opposite: you type your own rough notes answering a question, and it cleans each line up - capitalizing it, punctuating it, stripping stray bullet characters - into a consistent, postable bullet-point answer.
Nothing is added or inferred; each bullet is your own note, tidied for formatting only.
Why formatting consistency matters for a bullet answer
Rough notes typed quickly often mix capitalization, punctuation, and stray leading characters (dashes, asterisks, inconsistent numbering) - normalizing every line to the same capitalized, punctuated style makes the finished answer look deliberate and polished rather than like a hastily assembled list, even though the underlying content is unchanged.
Why the question field is optional
Sometimes you're building a bullet list that doesn't need a restated question above it - for a general checklist or a standalone list of points, skipping the question field keeps the output as just the clean bullets, while filling it in adds a bolded heading for contexts where showing the question adds useful context (like an FAQ entry).
Why this is useful for FAQ sections and quick answers
Turning your own scattered notes into a formatted bullet answer is a fast way to build FAQ entries or quick-reference answers from knowledge you already have in your head, without needing to write full grammatical sentences or worry about formatting consistency while you're still just getting your points down.